Medicare Advantage
Soon, ESRD patients will be permitted to enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, potentially bringing major changes to ESRD care and how patients experience it. DPC lobbied Congress to change the law to permit ESRD patients the choice to elect such plans. Under current restrictions, which will end in 2021, the only dialysis patients in MA plans are those whose kidneys failed while they were already enrolled in a plan.
Congress had previously enacted many changes to Medicare managed care that made MA plans more attractive relative to fee-for-service Medicare, including an out-of-pocket maximum that is lower than the cost sharing most dialysis patients are responsible for in a year. Medicare beneficiaries in MA plans do not need to purchase Medigap insurance, which will be of particular benefit to patients in states that do not mandate Medigap issuance to under-65 Medicare beneficiaries. Premiums for MA plans average about $30/month, far less expensive than Medigap supplements.
MA plans also have a reputation for coordinating the care of patients with complex needs. An insurer that keeps such patients out of the hospital will earn more money, aligning financial incentives to avoid complications. MA plans also have more flexibility to address patients’ individual needs than the relatively rigid and siloed fee-for-service program.
It is DPC’s expectation that some Medicare Advantage issuers will build on partnerships they already have with some large dialysis organizations to coordinate patients care. We are generally optimistic in anticipating that these programs will bring greater care coordination and improved outcomes. However, we recognize that unintended consequences are possible, and there is a long and unfortunate history of managed care organizations stinting on expensive care. CMS needs to be on top of this transition, to anticipate and prevent any problems for beneficiaries. A top DPC priority in the coming years will be ensuring that this transition brings a broad selection of high-quality choices for dialysis patients, and that insurers act in good faith and do not discourage high-cost patients from choosing or staying in their plans.
Related Information
Letter to the Editor: Expanding Medigap Will Save Lives
As a dialysis patient and healthcare professional, I urge California’s state legislature, especially Sen. Caroline Menjivar (CA-20) and Assemblymember Nick Schultz (CA-44), to support Senate Bill 242. This bill expands access to affordable Medigap [...]
Expand Medigap Coverage
My husband and I have end stage renal disease, or kidney failure, and depend on dialysis to survive. It is difficult for Texans in similar situations to afford lifesaving dialysis, especially people who don’t [...]
Georgia Medigap Legislation Passes First Hurdle
On February 24, HB 323 was unanimously approved by the Health Committee of the Georgia House of Representatives. Sponsored by State Representative Karen Mathiak (R-82), this legislation will provide affordable access to Medigap coverage to [...]
Medicare Drug Plans Are Getting Better Next Year. Some Will Also Cost More.
By Susan Jaffe October 21, 2024 When Pam McClure learned she’d save nearly $4,000 on her prescription drugs next year, she said, “it sounded too good to be true.” She and her husband are both retired [...]
DPC Comments to CMS Sound Alarm on Workforce Shortages
In our comments responding to Medicare’s annual ESRD Payment Rule, DPC took the government to task over payment updates that lag increases in labor costs and failure to effectively cover new drugs for dialysis [...]
Letter: Medicare, Medicaid not keeping up with inflation, hurting patient care
Dear Editor, I was born with a rare genetic disorder that caused my kidneys and eyes to be underdeveloped. I have battled chronic kidney disease at all levels throughout my entire life. At age [...]
